Good election news
One big bright spot: the property rights protection movement racked up an impressive string of victories. Ten of twelve ballot measures passed, and eight of them are constitutional amendments (one victory, Louisiana, was in September). Only California and Idaho defeated citizen initiatives dealing with eminent domain. They were thrilled yesterday at the Institute for Justice:
“Election Day usually reveals how polarized public opinion can be as campaigns focus on highly divisive issues. Today, however, the vast majority of voters across the country all agreed that the fundamental right to property must be protected,” said Chip Mellor, president and general counsel of the Institute for Justice, which represented the homeowners in Kelo before the Supreme Court. “Citizens around the nation agree that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo was wrong. As we’re seeing tonight’s results, this issue cuts across party lines, state borders and socioeconomic levels.”The margins were truly significant, typically three or four to one.
...
“The American people are furious their property rights are up for grabs to the highest bidder,” said senior attorney Scott Bullock, who argued the Kelo case for the Institute. “They understand that the U.S. Supreme Court declared open season on everyone’s property and the resulting momentum for eminent domain reform shows no sign of slowing. The significant margins in the votes today show just how wrong a narrow majority of the Supreme Court was.”
Here's another bit of good news: Dennis Hastert won't run for minority leader. I've made clear my low opinion of Hastert. I think he bears much of the blame for the Republican losses. Hastert helped create the "culture of corruption" by dismantling the 1994 ethics and accountability reforms. His lack of principles, inarticulateness, and focus on wielding the levers of power helped create the widespread distrust of the Republican Party.
If the Republicans really have been chastened and want to mend their ways, in January they'll follow Human Events' advice and elect Mike Pence minority leader. Furthermore, they should correct a mistake they made when DeLay departed and pick John Shadegg over Roy Blunt for the number two post, minority whip.
More good news came via Josh Poulson, who argued that the GOP lost because it "abandoned its libertarian wing," and cited a couple of interesting related items. One is this post at Economist.com about the growing clout of Libertarians:
The other item is Sen. Tom Coburn's statement on the elections:GLUM Republicans might turn their attention to the Libertarian Party to vent their anger. Libertarians are a generally Republican-leaning constituency, but over the last few years, their discontent has grown plain. It isn't just the war, which some libertarians supported, but the corruption and insider dealing, and particularly the massive expansion of spending. Mr Bush's much-vaunted prescription drug benefit for seniors, they fume, has opened up another gaping hole in America's fiscal situation, while the only issue that really seemed to energise congress was passing special laws to keep a brain-damaged woman on life support.
In two of the seats where control looks likely to switch, Missouri and Montana, the Libertarian party pulled more votes than the Democratic margin of victory. Considerably more, in Montana. If the Libertarian party hadn't been on the ballot, and the three percent of voters who pulled the "Libertarian" lever had broken only moderately Republican, Mr Burns would now be in office.
“The overriding theme of this election, however, is that voters are more interested in changing the culture in Washington than changing course in Washington, D.C. This election was not a rejection of conservative principles per se, but a rejection of corrupt, complacent and incompetent government.Read the whole thing. If you're a discouraged limited-government type, libertarian or conservative, you'll feel better -- and you'll be glad there are people like Tom Coburn in politics.
“A recent CNN poll found that 54 percent of Americans believe government is doing too much while only 37 percent want government to do more. The results of this election reflect that ... the Democrats who won or who ran competitive races sounded more like Ronald Reagan than Lyndon Johnson.
“This election does not show that voters have abandoned their belief in limited government; it shows that the Republican Party has abandoned them. In fact, these results represent the total failure of big government Republicanism.
“The Republican Party now has an opportunity to rediscover its identity as a party for limited government, free enterprise and individual responsibility. Most Americans still believe in these ideals, which reflect not merely the spirit of 1994 or the Reagan Revolution, but the vision of our founders. If Republicans present real ideas and solutions based on these principles we will do well in the future.
Cheer up Richard. The Democrats are barely in power. Joe Leiberman is the
pivot vote in the Senate, and he's going to want payback for the sodomizing
he took from his party. Nancy Pelosi is going to confuse anti-Irag
sentiment with tree hugger endorsement. And the Democrats couldn't
organize a a penny whistle band, much less keep them all playing one tune.
Most of the people elected as Dems are so far right Rohnold Raygun would be
shocked. I predict two years of increasingly desperate gridlock until the
election of '08. After that the rapture. All I'm really hoping for is
that we can investigate Rumsfeld until he's driven to ignominious suicide
and a VERY probing look at Halliburton's war profitering.
Keep 'em flying.
gorilla@large
P.S. I can't get this damn thing to let me declare myself.
Whatever
Libertarians are now oddly enough the centrists of the Republican Party.
Many people like myself feel betrayed by the new Republican Party who have
abandoned their roots in favor of huge Congressional earmarks and resulting
in "Bridges to nowhere". Now is the time for the Libertarian party to
separate themselves and create a third party movement, the base exists for
them to capture a new seats in the House. They lack the universal support
for the Presidency but there is no reason they can't make themselves a
strong but small unified front against Democratic Socialism and Republican
Extremism.