Combs Spouts Off

"It's my opinion and it's very true."

picture of Richard G. Combs
rgcombs AT gmail DOT com
Icon courtesy of
E-Mail Icon Generator
NoTaxHikers.org

Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto: Click to Read

The Neolibertarian Network


Firefly Season 2


I'm a fan of disproportionate response

Remember Rick Rescorla


Take Back the Memorial

The Community for Life, Liberty, Property


 
Anti-PC League


 

101st Fighting Keyboardists


 
Syndicate this site (SmartFeed™)

FeedBurner SmartFeed
 
Add to My Yahoo!
 
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
 
Read with NewsIsFree
 
Subscribe with Bloglines
 
Assorted small blogging-related icons

Listed in LS Blogs

Blogarama - The Blogs Directory

 


Bloggapedia - Find It!

BlogBurst
 
 
Contributor to: Newstex Blogs on Demand
««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
12
3
4
5
67
8
9
10
11
12
1314
1516171819
20
21
22232425262728
2930

Use calendar to browse by month or date

Search
Combs Spouts Off

Google search is very thorough, but literal (finds words in blogroll, for instance).

Google

Technorati Search


Technorati search is smarter (searches posts only), but doesn't always work.


Hit Counter

Total: 2,082,861
since: 8 Apr 2005

Cities, cars, and petroleum save trees

posted Thursday, 2 June 2005

At Volokh Conspiracy, Todd Zywicki has some thoughts about Vermont's apparent tree glut:

My colleague Alex Tabarrok notes that since the 1870s, forestation in Vermont has risen from 20% to 85%. He correctly notes that part of this is tremendous increases in agricultural productivity, reducing the need for farm land.

Don't forget, however, the effect of the invention of cars, which dramatically reduced demand for horses--and the need to clear open pastures for horse grazing, thereby permitting reforestation. In addition, wood used to be a primary source of fuel, so the turn toward fossil fuels and away from wood reduced the demand for chopping down trees to burn them. Of course, the discovery that petroleum could be used to produce energy also saved the whales from extinction and eliminated the rivers of manure that used to flow through American cities.

Zywicki's observations reinforce some points that Investor's Business Daily made on the 35th anniversary of Earth Day. In a post entitled Happy Earth Day! Now go thank a capitalist!, I summarized as follows:

First, the environment today is far cleaner than 35 years ago and a long list of threatened resources are on the increase.
...
Second, the environmentalists won't let that progress stop them from predicting doom and gloom, attacking our wasteful lifestyle, and demanding that we produce and consume less and "live more simply."
...
Third, environmentalism is a luxury good made possible by the success of capitalism in creating wealth. The eco-freaks who want us to emulate the third world economically for the benefit of the environment need to go visit that third world and see just how totally off-base they are.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button




1. Matthew left...
Wednesday, 31 January 2007 12:28 pm

These arguments are pretty lame. This is basically just describing the evolution of technology, and doesn't reflect that the environment is stable. Who are these eco freaks? They're actually 95% of the climate scientists studying the matter. It's possible to argue that gasoline reduced the demand for horses and the need to clear pastures, except for one small fact. Millions of automobiles take up more space than horses. hmm. Parking lots and highways, railways etc. all take up huge land spaces, and without cars this "clearing of pastures" wouldn't be possible.